
Pour yourself a hot cup of coffee, sit back and get familiar with
Faux Districts (or what the Miami Herald calls
The Incumbent Protection Act).
The redistricting amendment shoved through the Senate at the close of session counters two anti-gerrymandering
citizen initiatives on the ballot November 2.
The Miami Herald,
4/21/2010:
(...)
"Legislators failed to quash the state petition drive that will put amendments 5 and 6 on the ballot. Their lawsuit failed, and now they're betting on legislative tactics. Blaming the Republicans in charge is easy, but the truth is this is about power, and the Democrats have their own sorry history on gerrymandering to stay in control.
(...)
Amendments 5 and 6 would make it much harder to manipulate redistricting to serve any special interest. Districts would have to be compact, contiguous and ensure fair representation for minorities and communities so that cities like Fort Lauderdale wouldn't be split up into four congressional districts. If new districts don't meet those requirements, voters could -- and should -- take the issue to court."
The Florida Constitution stipulates the process of redistricting after completion of the Census. What is not stipulated--the favor or disfavor of a political party upon redistricting. The constitution must be amended to include such language.
Placing the Legislative Amendment on the ballot is one smacker of a dirty political trick. Should all three Amendments pass, the Legislative Amendment negates voter passage of Amendment 5 and Amendment 6.
So get knowledgeable and pass the word to friends and families about the wool the state legislature is attempting to drop before their eyes.
Vote YES for Fair Districts Amendment 5 and 6.
***
THE FAIR: VOTE YES!
FairDistrictsFlorida Reforms:
AMENDMENT 5
STANDARDS FOR LEGISLATURE TO FOLLOW IN LEGISLATIVE REDISTRICTING
BALLOT SUMMARY: Legislative districts or districting plans may not be drawn to favor or disfavor an incumbent or political party. Districts shall not be drawn to deny racial or language minorities the equal opportunity to participate in the political process and elect representatives of their choice. Districts must be contiguous. Unless otherwise required, districts must be compact, as equal in population as feasible, and where feasible must make use of existing city, county and geographical boundaries.
Full text:
In establishing Legislative district boundaries:
(1) No apportionment plan or district shall be drawn with the intent to favor or disfavor a political party or an incumbent; and districts shall not be drawn with the intent or result of denying or abridging the equal opportunity of racial or language minorities to participate in the political process or to diminish their ability to elect representatives of their choice; and districts shall consist of contiguous territory.
(2) Unless compliance with the standards in this subsection conflicts with the standards in subsection (1) or with federal law, districts shall be as nearly equal in population as is practicable; districts shall be compact; and districts shall, where feasible, utilize existing political and geographical boundaries.
(3) The order in which the standards within sub-sections (1) and (2) of this section are set forth shall not be read to establish any priority of one standard over the other within that subsection.
AMENDMENT 6
STANDARDS FOR LEGISLATURE TO FOLLOW IN CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING BALLOT SUMMARY: Congressional districts or districting plans may not be drawn to favor or disfavor an incumbent or political party. Districts shall not be drawn to deny racial or language minorities the equal opportunity to participate in the political process and elect representatives of their choice. Districts must be contiguous. Unless otherwise required, districts must be compact, as equal in population as feasible, and where feasible must make use of existing city, county and geographical boundaries. Full text:In establishing Congressional district boundaries:
(1) No apportionment plan or individual district shall be drawn with the intent to favor or disfavor a political party or an incumbent; and districts shall not be drawn with the intent or result of denying or abridging the equal opportunity of racial or language minorities to participate in the political process or to diminish their ability to elect representatives of their choice; and districts shall consist of contiguous territory.
(2) Unless compliance with the standards in this subsection conflicts with the standards in subsection (1) or with federal law, districts shall be as nearly equal in population as is practicable; districts shall be compact; and districts shall, where feasible, utilize existing political and geographical boundaries.
(3) The order in which the standards within sub-sections (1) and (2) of this section are set forth shall not be read to establish any priority of one standard over the other within that subsection.
***
THE FAUX: VOTE NO!
The Legislative Solution:HJR 7231 AND
SJR 2288:
The Florida Constitution requires the Legislature, by joint resolution at its regular session in the second year after the United States Census, to apportion state legislative districts. The United States Constitution requires the reapportionment of the United States House of Representatives every ten years, which includes the distribution of the House‘s 435 seats between the states and the equalization of population between districts within each state.
Two citizen initiatives, related to redistricting, have secured placement on the 2010 General Election ballot. Amendments 5 and 6, promoted by FairDistrictsFlorida.org, would add standards for state legislative and congressional redistricting to the Florida Constitution. The amendments do not contain definitions for the proposed new standards, which may have the effect of restricting the range of redistricting choices available under the federal Voting Rights Act.
The proposed joint resolution would create a new Section 20 to Article III of the Florida Constitution. The new section would add new state constitutional standards for establishing legislative and congressional district boundaries. The proposed standards in the joint resolution would complement the proposed standards in Amendment 5 and 6 and provide for a balancing of the various constitutional redistricting standards.
Specifically, the proposed joint resolution would require that the state apply federal requirements in its balancing and implementing of the redistricting standards in the state constitution. Both the equal opportunity of racial and language minorities to participate in the political process and communities of interest are established as standards that are on equal footing as any other standard in the state constitution. Therefore minority access districts can be considered, and communities of interest can be respected and promoted, as matters of legislative discretion. Finally, the joint resolution asserts that districts and plans are valid if the standards in the state constitution were balanced and implemented rationally and consistent with federal law.
The proposed joint resolution would require approval by 60% of the voting electorate in Florida‘s 2010 General Election.
Labels: Dean Cannon, Fair Districts Florida, gerry mandering, Mike Haridopolos